Sadly, here's another talented singer who feels the need to pose nude 9semi nude). I'd love to see a future where women are taken seriously for their talent and not whether they get unclad. Women should start taking themselves seriously too!
I remember when she used to be very private. Don't know hat became of her lately? She's rich so it beats me why she's going unclad on magazine covers now.
The artist looks like an amateur with Photoshop. He/She took off 30% of her thighs while editing her photo. Air brushing to the point that she doesn't look real. Don't people understand that cover photo shots are a small resemblance of the actual person?
This is not the picture i want my 12 year old daughter to model herself on. Why do talented singers feel they need to pose in their underwear. Its so not cool.
She looks great!
ReplyDeleteNice
ReplyDeletewow, she doesn't even look like someone who has an issue yet!
ReplyDeleteI support,cos those lines(don't knw wat the name is called) is not look dark and visible.
Deletewow, so cute!!!
ReplyDeleteYou got it? Flaunt it!
ReplyDeleteThe legs look "doctored"! he legs are thicker than that
ReplyDeleteSadly, here's another talented singer who feels the need to pose nude 9semi nude). I'd love to see a future where women are taken seriously for their talent and not whether they get unclad. Women should start taking themselves seriously too!
ReplyDeleteNot another one. Bey, you're rich, talented and beautiful and a mother - why pose unclad!!! It's your husband's exclusive preserve!
ReplyDeleteBeyonce we know you've still got it after you had a baby - super hot. But time to leave the half naked shots to Rihanna.........oh, and your husband
ReplyDeleteShe's really desperate and Kim and Rihanna have stolen the show. Why go unclad?
ReplyDeleteShe looks too photoshopped!
ReplyDeleteI remember when she used to be very private. Don't know hat became of her lately? She's rich so it beats me why she's going unclad on magazine covers now.
ReplyDeleteWe can't deny the fact that she is a beautiful woman, however covers like this are just trashy. I'm starting to dislike her more by the minute.
ReplyDeleteHow the heck do her thighs not touch??? Air-brushed photo!
ReplyDeleteShe trying to, maybe, "keep up with the Kardashians" and Rihanna too!
ReplyDeleteshe's getting lighter by the day. Are we expecting another Waco Jacko?
ReplyDeleteThese celebs bore me
ReplyDeleteThe artist looks like an amateur with Photoshop. He/She took off 30% of her thighs while editing her photo. Air brushing to the point that she doesn't look real. Don't people understand that cover photo shots are a small resemblance of the actual person?
ReplyDeleteThe guys would probably love your pose(and I'm jealous), but you should let the Kim Kardashians and Rihannas of the world do this.
ReplyDeleteShow the real picturebefore she was airbrushed. Then can talk...
ReplyDeleteWhy do magazines need to airbrush so much!! in her other photos she's a lot darker, she almost looks like white with a tan!
ReplyDeleteThis is not the picture i want my 12 year old daughter to model herself on. Why do talented singers feel they need to pose in their underwear. Its so not cool.
ReplyDeleteShe's bootylicious ... but this in NOT a good way to show it!
ReplyDeleteThis is'nt new for her. Have'nt u guys seen her music videos? She goes half naked most of d time in her videos.
ReplyDelete